Fresh allegations have emerged about expense claims made during Prince Andrew’s time as the UK’s trade representative, raising new questions about oversight and accountability.
Retired civil servants have told BBC that Andrew charged taxpayers for massage services and incurred what they describe as excessive travel and accommodation costs while serving as the UK’s trade envoy between 2001 and 2011. One former official said he initially refused to authorise a claim for massage services following a Middle East trip but was later overruled by senior staff.
Another former senior Whitehall official, who oversaw finances at the time, said he had “absolutely no doubt” about the authenticity of similar expenses. He described weak controls, poor record keeping and a culture of deference towards the then prince, which meant trips and spending were often approved without scrutiny.
Andrew’s role as trade representative was unpaid, but it was supported by civil servants and funded by taxpayers. The Department for Business and Trade has not challenged the claims about expenses, but has pointed to an ongoing police investigation. It has also said Andrew’s position differed from today’s trade envoys, who now operate under clearer rules of conduct.
Andrew has denied any wrongdoing and has consistently rejected claims of improper behaviour linked to his association with Jeffrey Epstein. His trade role ended after those links became public.
MPs are expected to discuss whether to launch an inquiry into historic trade envoy roles. Meanwhile, Thames Valley Police have arrested Andrew on suspicion of misconduct in public office, though he has not been charged.
For more news and update, click here to download our mobile app – Veritas Daily
To explore advertising or sponsorship collaborations, click here to contact us
Leave a Reply